• office2010trial > jhtjr@thompsonlawofficecom
  • jhtjr@thompsonlawofficecom

    免费下载 下载该文档 文档格式:PDF   更新时间:2010-07-01   下载次数:0   点击次数:1
    文档基本属性
    文档语言:Traditional Chinese
    文档格式:pdf
    文档作者:SiSi
    关键词:
    主题:
    备注:
    点击这里显示更多文档属性
    IN THE MISSOURI SUPREME COURT ROBERT D. CAIN, ET AL., ) ) Respondents, ) ) ) ) ) ) Appellant. )
    Cause No. SC90511
    v. SHERRI PORTER,
    ______________________________________________________________________
    ON APPEAL FROM THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________
    SUBSTITUTE BRIEF OF RESPONDENTS ROBERT D. CAIN ET. AL. ______________________________________________________________________
    James H. Thompson, Jr.
    MO #25985
    Attorney for Respondents One Town Square North Kansas City, MO 64116 Phone: (816) 471-3414 Fax: (816) 471-3417 Table of Contents Table of Authorities ………………………………………………………..……………..3 Statement of Facts………………………………………………………………..……….5 Points Relied On Point I …………………………………………………………………...….8 Point II …………………………………………………………………..…9 Point III ………………………………………………………………...…10 Argument……………………………………………………………………………..….11 The Trial Court's Denial of Appellant's Rule 74.06 Motion for Relief Must be Affirmed Because the Trial Court Judgment did not Violate the Bankruptcy Proceeding's Automatic Stay and was Therefore not Void ab initio……………………………………..………………………….…...11 Standard of Review……...………………………………………………………..11 The trial court judgment did not violate the automatic stay…………………...…11 The Trial Court's Denial Must be Affirmed Even if There was a Violation of the Automatic Stay Because Judgments Obtained in Violation of the Automatic Stay are Voidable, not Void ab initio……………….13 Appellant's actions did not violate congressional intent behind
    1
    the § 362 automatic stay……………………………………………………….…13 Bankruptcy law permits retroactive validation of acts taken in violation of the automatic stay……………………………………………………15
    2
    The Trial Court Decision Denying Appellant's Rule 74.06 Motion for Relief Must be Affirmed Because the Doctrine of Collateral Estoppel Bars Appellant From Raising the Issue of Subject Matter Jurisdiction………………………………………………………………..18 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….21 Certificate of Compliance and service…………………………………………………...22 Appendix…………………………………………………………………………………23

    下一页

  • 下载地址 (推荐使用迅雷下载地址,速度快,支持断点续传)
  • 免费下载 PDF格式下载
  • 您可能感兴趣的
  • office2010trial密钥  office2010trialexe  office2010trial密钥  office2010trial密匙  office2010trial密钥  office2010trial密匙  office2003trial  office2010最新密钥  office2010